Adjusted NHL Stat Sheet
Who has the most useless points?
The stats sheet is awesome, but doesn't take into account the 12F and 6D that you can put on the ice. I have done this for you. Not a whole lot of change at the bottom, but this effects the top teams.
Let's take a look!
Rank | Team | G | A | PTS | Team | Adjustment | Adjusted Rank | Team | G | A | PTS | ||
1 | CAL | 148 | 259 | 407 | CAL | -64 | 1 | COL | 130 | 271 | 401 | ||
2 | COL | 133 | 272 | 405 | COL | -4 | 2 | LAK | 156 | 202 | 358 | ||
3 | CLB | 156 | 230 | 386 | CLB | -42 | 3 | NYI | 128 | 217 | 345 | ||
4 | LAK | 169 | 215 | 384 | LAK | -26 | 4 | CLB | 140 | 204 | 344 | ||
5 | LVG | 137 | 226 | 363 | LVG | -20 | 5 | CAL | 123 | 220 | 343 | ||
6 | NYI | 133 | 225 | 358 | NYI | -13 | 6 | LVG | 128 | 215 | 343 | ||
7 | TBL | 124 | 212 | 336 | TBL | -23 | 7 | BOS | 122 | 204 | 326 | ||
8 | NYR | 120 | 216 | 336 | NYR | -11 | 8 | DAL | 138 | 188 | 326 | ||
9 | CHI | 131 | 200 | 331 | CHI | -7 | 9 | NYR | 119 | 206 | 325 | ||
10 | DAL | 139 | 188 | 327 | DAL | -1 | 10 | CHI | 129 | 195 | 324 | ||
11 | BOS | 122 | 205 | 327 | BOS | -1 | 11 | OTT | 118 | 195 | 313 | ||
12 | OTT | 118 | 195 | 313 | OTT | 0 | 12 | TBL | 115 | 198 | 313 | ||
13 | WIN | 89 | 199 | 288 | WIN | -12 | 13 | WIN | 86 | 190 | 276 | ||
14 | TOR | 93 | 173 | 266 | TOR | -15 | 14 | NJD | 94 | 160 | 254 | ||
15 | NJD | 95 | 165 | 260 | NJD | -6 | 15 | NAS | 107 | 146 | 253 | ||
16 | DET | 84 | 174 | 258 | DET | -10 | 16 | TOR | 90 | 161 | 251 | ||
17 | NAS | 107 | 146 | 253 | NAS | 0 | 17 | DET | 82 | 166 | 248 | ||
18 | ARI | 76 | 153 | 229 | ARI | -1 | 18 | ARI | 76 | 152 | 228 | ||
19 | MON | 74 | 154 | 228 | MON | -12 | 19 | PIT | 97 | 129 | 226 | ||
20 | PIT | 97 | 129 | 226 | PIT | 0 | 20 | MON | 69 | 147 | 216 | ||
21 | CAR | 92 | 122 | 214 | CAR | 0 | 21 | CAR | 92 | 122 | 214 | ||
22 | STL | 82 | 126 | 208 | STL | 0 | 22 | STL | 82 | 126 | 208 | ||
23 | EDM | 68 | 138 | 206 | EDM | -5 | 23 | EDM | 66 | 135 | 201 | ||
24 | BUF | 77 | 118 | 195 | BUF | 0 | 24 | BUF | 77 | 118 | 195 | ||
25 | WAS | 62 | 118 | 180 | WAS | -10 | 25 | WSH | 58 | 112 | 170 | ||
26 | FLA | 60 | 107 | 167 | FLA | -19 | 26 | FLA | 53 | 95 | 148 | ||
27 | VAN | 51 | 94 | 145 | VAN | 0 | 27 | VAN | 51 | 94 | 145 | ||
28 | ANA | 52 | 80 | 132 | ANA | 0 | 28 | ANA | 53 | 80 | 132 | ||
29 | PHI | 52 | 71 | 123 | PHI | -4 | 29 | PHI | 49 | 70 | 119 | ||
30 | SJS | 39 | 78 | 117 | SJS | 0 | 30 | SJS | 39 | 78 | 117 | ||
31 | MIN | 48 | 67 | 115 | MIN | 0 | 31 | MIN | 48 | 67 | 115 | ||
32 | SEA | 49 | 66 | 115 | SEA | 0 | 32 | SEA | 49 | 66 | 115 |
There are a few with huge drops due to excessive depth (CAL, CLB). I will do this at the end of the year as well to see if these players kept up this rate.
Ths adjusted rank should show us who can put out the best offensive teams. But...we all see how an all offensive team *COUGH* Kings *COUGH* can't win consistently and will probably be out the first round.

I got a headache trying to follow